<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joss Whedon Officially Signed to Write and Direct THE AVENGERS 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.unleashthefanboy.com/movies/joss-whedon-officially-signed-for-the-avengers-2/23275/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.unleashthefanboy.com/movies/joss-whedon-officially-signed-for-the-avengers-2/23275</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Fats Mclemlich</title>
		<link>http://www.unleashthefanboy.com/movies/joss-whedon-officially-signed-for-the-avengers-2/23275#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Fats Mclemlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unleashthefanboy.com/?p=23275#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>I might be the only one not excited by this news.  I thought the character interaction was interesting in the first one, but the storyline itself could have been more interesting (despite the fact taht they were more interested in the characters).  

I&#039;m also not a fan of Whedon&#039;s aesthetics.  The world didn&#039;t really look &#039;lived in&#039;, and veered too far towards camp for me.


With all of that said, the flick was really good, but I&#039;m just bothered by the look of it, which is something integral to Whedon&#039;s direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might be the only one not excited by this news.  I thought the character interaction was interesting in the first one, but the storyline itself could have been more interesting (despite the fact taht they were more interested in the characters).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not a fan of Whedon&#8217;s aesthetics.  The world didn&#8217;t really look &#8216;lived in&#8217;, and veered too far towards camp for me.</p>
<p>With all of that said, the flick was really good, but I&#8217;m just bothered by the look of it, which is something integral to Whedon&#8217;s direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using xcache
Page Caching using xcache
Database Caching 7/16 queries in 0.035 seconds using xcache
Object Caching 326/351 objects using xcache
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: unleashthefanboy.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: www.unleashthefanboy.com @ 2013-05-20 03:39:48 -->